Retirement Plan to IRA

Hello — I have the option of converting my accumulated retirement plan balance (which is a combination of 401K, deferred comp, Profit Sharing plan, etc) to a 9-year annuity from my former employer. In this case the former employer self-funds and administers everything, i.e. it is not an insurance company annuity. As I understand it, the amount I annuitize becomes part of the company’s DB obligations and is covered by the PBGC up to PBGC limits.
The retireees I know all take these monthly payments as regular taxable pension income. However, I’d like to roll my monthly payments into an IRA instead.
1) The discussion below from your forum seems to indicate that IRA rollovers would be allowed if the payments were annually but not monthly????
2) Or does the discussion below cover something entirely different???
Thanks!

Re: Defined Benefit Plan to IRA
by alan-oniras » Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:18 pm
I assume she is being offered a lump sum option for all or part of this plan, and you are referring to that lump sum. If so, this is done all the time as the lump sum is an eligible rollover distribution. It could go to a TIRA in a direct rollover or to a Roth IRA as a 2010 conversion with taxes deferred to 2011 and 2012. If she wants to split it, probably best to roll the entire amount to a TIRA and convert from there.

If the plan has no option other than monthly annuitized benefits for life, those payments are NOT eligible for rollover because they are paid for life (See below).

The following is copied from the IRS Reg defining an eligible rollover distribution in Sec 402(c)2, Q&A 3:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Q–3: What is an eligible rollover distribution?

A–3: (a) General rule. Unless specifically excluded, an eligible rollover distribution means any distribution to an employee (or to a spousal distributee described in Q&A–12(a) of this section) of all or any portion of the balance to the credit of the employee in a qualified plan. Thus, except as specifically provided in Q&A–4(b) of this section, any amount distributed to an employee (or such a spousal distributee) from a qualified plan is an eligible rollover distribution, regardless of whether it is a distribution of a benefit that is protected under section 411(d)(6).

(b) Exceptions. An eligible rollover distribution does not include the following:

(1) Any distribution that is one of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made (not less frequently than annually) over any one of the following periods—

(i) The life of the employee (or the joint lives of the employee and the employee’s designated beneficiary);

(ii) The life expectancy of the employee (or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the employee and the employee’s designated beneficiary); or

(iii) A specified period of ten years or more;

(2) Any distribution to the extent the distribution is a required minimum distribution under section 401(a)(9); or

(3) The portion of any distribution that is not includible in gross income (determined without regard to the exclusion for net unrealized appreciation described in section 402(e)(4)). Thus, for example, an eligible rollover distribution does not include the portion of any distribution that is excludible from gross income under section 72 as a return of the employee’s investment in the contract (e.g., a return of the employee’s after-tax contributions), but does include net unrealized appreciation.



You should be able to roll these distributions over because they are calculated for a period less than 10 years and are not based on your life or joint life expectancy. If the period was 10 or more years (see b. (iii) in the copied Regs) then you could not roll the distributions over. It does not matter if your payout from the DB plan was monthly or one full annual check as long as you received at least one check every calendar year. You could do the rollover here because your distributions would be considered rollover eligible (less than 10 years).

One issue you would encounter is mandatory 20% wittholding because these distributions are rollover eligible. It seems counterintuitive, but if you could NOT roll them over, then there is no mandatory withholding.

A second issue would surface if the 9 year period reached into the year you turned 70.5. In that case, some of the distribution would be deemed to be your RMD and you could not roll that part over, but then mandatory withholding should not apply to it either.



Alan, thank you very much.



Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments