Spousal Beneficiary Publication 590 confusion – HELP
In the 2012 publication 590 on page 37, left hand side near the top, there is a section with the heading “Spouse as sole designated beneficiary” which includes the following short paragraph:
“Use the life expectancy listed in the table next to the spouse’s age (as of the spouse’s birthday in 2013). If the owner died before the year in which he or she reached age 7012, distributions to the spouse do not need to begin until the year in which the owner would have reached age 7012.”
On page 38, towards the bottom left-hand side, under the heading “Surviving Spouse” the following short paragraph appears:
“If you are the owner’s surviving spouse and sole designated beneficiary, the owner had not reached age 7012 when he or she died, and you do not elect to be treated as the owner of the IRA, you do not have to take distributions (and use Table I) until the year in which the owner would have reached age 7012.”
Further, when I have spoken to a few people about this, they say that the surviving spouse should transfer her deceased spouse’s IRA into her own IRA and then she wouldn’t have to take the RMD’s until she reaches age 70.
What is the explanation for this apparent discrepency in Pub. 590 and what is the right answer on options for a sole-beneficiary, surviving spouse of an IRA holder.
Thank you,
Patrick
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Wed, 2013-02-06 19:31
There isn’t any inconsistencies in the two quotes. They both indicate that a sole surviving spouse does not have to take RMDs as a beneficiary until the year the deceased spouse would have reached 70.5. When the inherited IRA should be rolled over depends on both spouse’s ages and whether funds are needed before RMDs begin. Once an inherited spousal IRA is rolled over RMDs change from beneficiary RMDs to owner RMDs. The following guidelines generally should be observed:
Permalink Submitted by Patrick Rudy on Wed, 2013-02-06 20:14
Thank you for the clarification and I understand what you lay out.