401k
Client under liquidated 401k and took advantage of net unrealized appreciation (NUA).
NUA stock moved to personal brokerage which also contained same company stock as the NUA stock.
What are the tax and/or penalty cost consequences:
1. Of the receipt of the NUA stock
2. Dividends received on NUA stock
3. Sale of NUA: prior to 12 months from transfer
After 12 months from transfer
4. Which shares of the mix of stocks in the account (have both NUA and same non-NUA stocks) would be considered sold first.
5. Can client setup 72T with non-NUA rollover amounts.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Thu, 2015-01-08 17:47
Permalink Submitted by Richard P. Musko on Mon, 2015-01-12 21:24
Taxpayerage 55 retires and rolls out his 401k plan to 0 . NUS stock to personal brokerage account and remainder to rollover IRA account . NUA is subject to regular tax.Is the NUA cost basis subject to the 10 % since taxpayer is under age 59and a half
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Mon, 2015-01-12 21:33
Probably no penalty. If he separates in the year he reaches 55 or later, there is a penalty exception for that.
Permalink Submitted by Kermit Griner on Tue, 2018-04-03 21:59
I have a client separating from employment 04/30/2018 He has $379,778 in company owned stock. His NUA is $162,138. He has no after tax cash to pkay the tax, what would be best strategy? Do the NUA or just roll it over to an IRA?
Permalink Submitted by Kermit Griner on Tue, 2018-04-03 21:59
I have a client separating from employment 04/30/2018 He has $379,778 in company owned stock. His NUA is $162,138. He has no after tax cash to pkay the tax, what would be best strategy? Do the NUA or just roll it over to an IRA?
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Tue, 2018-04-03 22:10
With a cost basis of around 57%, client would be better off rolling the shares over and selling enough shares to be properly diversified. The only exception that might apply would be if he needs funds from this retirement plan within the next year for expenses and he is separating at 55 or later. After determining how much he needs from the plan, he could have shares with a total value transferred to his taxable brokerage account, and sell them to cover the expenses. He would have no penalty on the cost basis due to separation at 55 and his NUA would be taxed at the lower LT Cap gain rate. The rest of the company shares could be rolled to an IRA or sold in the plan first. If there is any after tax money in the plan, that provides another opportunity in properly applying it. Usually, NUA is most useful when the cost basis is less than 30%, so the cost basis here is not even close.