RMDs

Suppose client is 73 and a participant in a Profit Sharing Plan at his company. Wife is primary beneficiary (assume similar age) and 3 children 1/3 back-up beneficiaries. Client passes away. I just want to confirm the following:

1. Wife has the option of keeping the funds in the Profit Sharing Plan or rolling them into her IRA. If kept in the Profit Sharing Plan does she have the ability (as a spouse would if this were an IRA) to either become the owner or inherit the Profit Sharing Plan as the beneficiary?

2. When wife passes away, and assume the monies remain in the Profit Sharing Plan, each child becomes a 1/3 owner. If it were in an IRA, they would split the shares and title new Inherited IRAs and make the appropriate 1/3 transfers.

A. If the funds remain 100% in the Profit Sharing Plan, would each beneficiary title their Inherited Profit Sharing Plan account as they would if it were in an Inherited IRA?

B. I assume 1 or more children may roll the Profit Sharing Plan into their own Inherited IRA, with 1 or more children retaining the funds in the Profit Sharing Plan thru some type of Inherited Profit Sharing Plan (as per A). Is this correct?

C. Irrespective of whether the 3 children retain the funds in the Profit Sharing Plan or roll the funds into their own Inherited IRAs, they must take RMDs by 12/31 of the year following their mother’s death based upon the mother’s Single Life Table since she was the primary beneficiary. Is this correct?

Thank you!

Jason



  1. For her share of the profit sharing plan the only option is to remain as beneficiary. Ownership can only be attained through an IRA rollover.
  2. A) No, the children’s respective 1/3 interests would have to be tracked as separate sub accounts within the plan. There is no re-titling done.   B)   They could do a direct rollover to inherited IRAs and the plan provisions may or may not require that. Note that the children would be successor beneficiaries continuing wife’s RMD schedule if funds remained in the plan, but if wife rolled over her share to an IRA she owned while living, the children would be named as designated beneficiaries of her IRA, and each would get a stretch using their own life expectancy if separate inherited IRAs were created by the deadline. Therefore, the IRA rollover is advisable for the wife so that the children will get a longer stretch.   C) The children’s RMD deadline is the same either way, but those RMDs will be much lower if they inherit an IRA rather than a successor beneficiary interest in the plan. Single life table would apply in both cases with a reduction of 1.0 each successive year.
  3. In summary, the only way the children get their own stretch instead of continuing the RMD schedule of the wife is if the wife OWNS her IRA when she passes, since that is the only way for the children to be designated beneficiaries rather than merely successor beneficiaries.

  



Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments