Do losses on an Inherited IRA qualify as losses on a Traditional IRA?
Fidelity told me the IRA-BDA (Beneficiary Distribution Account) *is* a Traditional IRA. I began withdrawing the IRA-BDA funds in 2012, indeed, I have been living on them. They were exhausted in 2017. Sincere thanks if you can send me a link to an IRS or tax code website verifying that IRA-BDAs are considered Traditional IRAs. I’m aware of Mr. Slott’s admonitions from a March 2009 doc: 1) all the funds must be withdrawn from all the IRAs I own … 2) there was basis in the IRA-BDA … 3) a loss can be claimed only if there is basis and that basis is higher than the amount withdrawn. I’m also aware of Mr. Slott’s additional hurdles: 4) I can itemize … 5) the loss will be a Miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the 2% of Adjusted Gross Income limitation … 6) my AGI has not & will not come anywhere near exceeding $159,950 (the 2008 standard – I hypothesize that number is still relatively relevant). I don’t know about Mr. Slott’s warning that “you can lose the deduction if you get hit with the alternative minimum tax”. My AGI since 2012 has been at poverty line levels. Thank you again for any help.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Thu, 2018-03-22 02:28
Permalink Submitted by David Mertz on Thu, 2018-03-22 13:05
Since basis in inherited and owned IRA accounts must remain separate (and also must remain separate between traditional and Roth), it would make no sense for the individual’s own IRAs to have to be drained to permit a deduction for unrecoverable basis in an inherited IRA. Similarly, the IRS does not require traditional IRA accounts to be drained to be able to claim this deduction for unrecoverable Roth IRA basis or vice versa. But IRS guidance does not seem to address the situation of unrecoverable inherited IRA basis explicilty.