IRA contribution deduction/questionable 401K participant

I have been unable to determine if the IRS would allow me to deduct 100% of an traditional IRA contribution for TY 2017 or rather consider me still a plan participant as an employee of the family business based on a W2 issued for three days of 2016 sick leave that was finally paid to me in early 2017. The box on the W2 is checked indicating that I am a participant in the family company 401K plan.
I have consulted the third party administrator for the 401K plan that we enjoyed in the family business, the IRS website and accountants to determine if I am still considered a plan participant in the 401K. To further muddy the water he 1) never properly terminated my employment 2) reported to the plan administrator that I had zero income from the company in 2017 and the administrator assigned an arbitrary termination date of 7/1/2017 but upon further communication suggest that date is open to change ie 1/1/2017. As I set up the plan, I know that it stipulates that one must be employed on the last day of the year to participate in profit sharing.

I am legally separated and filing my own tax return as the divorce is not finalized. We have not lived together for the year of 2017. At age 60 I have only a few more years to contribute to my retirement and that is the reason for me pursuing a 2017 contribution to an IRA. My reportable income for 2017 TX consists of temporary spousal support of $105,214 and the meager $640.24 California three days of required sick leave reported on the W-2. My accountants solution was to simply “uncheck the box” posts of the electronic return and see how it goes; argue with the IRS later. Maybe the $6,500 IRA contribution is not worth the trouble and cost of defense with the IRS. Do I qualify to contribute to a Roth IRA instead?

I would welcome any help in clarifying my situation as tax and IRA deadlines are fast approaching.

Susan



  • If there was no 401k deferrals showing on the W-2 and no profit sharing or other plan contribution made to your plan for 2017, you are not an active participant and Box 13 should not be checked. You should ask the employer to issue a corrected W-2. You could do as your accountant indicated, but the IRS might challenge. If they won’t issue the corrected W-2 you should include an explanatory statement with your return why you are claiming the IRA deduction.
  • As an alternative you do qualify for a regular Roth contribution that is not affected by the W-2. If you already made the TIRA contribution, you can recharacterize it as a Roth contribution.

I have not contributed to the traditional IRA yet. Getting a corrected W2 seems nearly impossible since the employer, who is my soon to be ex, fired paychex payroll company.  Perhaps I would be smarter to simply fund a Roth IRA. From what I read on the IRS website, I would meet the income requirements as I’m married filing seperate and because I have not lived with my spouse they use the single income limits. I assume my  California court ordered temporary spousal support is qualified income as I pay taxes on it.

Yes, there should be no issues with the Roth contribution compared to contesting the report that you were an active participant in the 401k.

  • If the 401(k) plan is not a calendar-year plan, it’s likely that you are an active participant for 2017 since you were still employed in December 2016.  From IRS Pub 590-A:  “Generally, you are covered by a defined contribution plan for a tax year if amounts are contributed or allocated to your account for the plan year that ends with or within that tax year.”
  • Check your plan documents to see if the plan is a calendar-year plan or instead has a plan year than ends in some month other than December.  If the plan year ends in some month other than December, additions made from the beginning of the plan year in 2016 through the end of 2016 for the plan year ending in 2017 make you covered for 2017.

Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments