inherited IRA from estate to heirs
Hello,
My father passed away at the age of 85 this past April 7th. He had been taking RMD;s. Unfortunately, he named his estate as the beneficiary of his IRA. Their are seven siblings who are heirs to the estate. My research has shown that the IRA needs to be re-titled as the Estate IRA, Deceased. Once that is done, according to Revenue Ruling 78-406, the IRA can be divided into seven equal IRA’s “for the benefit of: Sibling”. Also that neither of these events are considered a taxable event.
The attorney’s handling the estate seem to have no clue that this is possible despite my sharing a lot of documentation from many sources, such as Kiplinger, Investopedia, and Fidelity. They also seem to be pushing for a PLR. I know a PLR cannot be used as precedent, however, a revenue ruling can be. I think this is a money grab on the part of the attorneys.
The executors (my brother) have asked for the following questions to be answered. Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated.
1. When an estate is the named beneficiary of the traditional IRA, the executors can transfer the entire balance of the account into separate accounts for the benefit of each of the estate beneficiaries;
2. This transfer is not a taxable event and that the entire balance will not be taxable in the year of transfer;
3. The beneficiaries can then stretch out the collection of their respective accounts for up to 10 years; and,
4. That neither the co-executors of the estate or Morgan Stanley can be held liable for any penalties or taxes due as a result of this lump sum division in the initial year, or in any subsequent years if the beneficiaries do not take out their required minimum distributions and pay their respective taxes, penalties and interest.
Thank you,
Bill Ferrell
818-590-1590
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Fri, 2020-10-23 20:16