Consequences of Isolating 401K Basis Strategy – follow up

Earlier this year I recommended to a client and followed to the letter the strategy of isolating 401k basis by
taking a single indirect distribution from the QRP and rolling the pre-tax and after-tax (non-Roth) portions into, respectively,
a rollover IRA and a new Roth IRA. We made up for the required tax withholding with available after-tax cash.

After taking a tax update this month, the instructor and I discussed this strategy in light of the 2011
Paschall v Commissioner ruling (137 T.C., No.2). Not that facts and circumstances are similar, but I have
become concerned that, if the isolation of basis strategy is challenged, then it may follow this course:

1. Rolling QRP after-tax dollars into a Roth IRA is different that rolling them into
a TIRA. A Roth IRA is a different animal than a TIRA.
2. That being the case, if disqualified, the amounts in the Roth represent an excess contribution
and, as such, are subject to the 6% penalty. It’s that 6% on $65,000 that concerns me.

I want to present to the client the plusses and minuses so they can decide whether to stay put or simply
remove the new Roth dollars into a taxable account (or a non-deductible IRA, for that matter).

Are there opinions or experiences with the isolation strategy that have developed during 2011 that can be shared? Also, are there
any special reporting requirements/disclosures that should appear on the 2011 tax return?

Many thanks and Happy Holidays!

Chip Simon



Without commenting on your proposal, but just on Paschall, surely the taxpayer in Paschall should have known the transaction would not have a happy ending.

Here is a link to Paschall: http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/paschall.TC.WPD.pdf



Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments