Did the Roth Conversion Tax Rules Change?
I seem to remember that a person with a traditional IRA could convert part of their TIRA one year, pay the taxes due on the amount converted, then in a future year, repeat. Again, only paying taxes on the converted amount.
If you Google this “Psst…the Backdoor Route to a Roth IRA” and read the article that comes up from wsj.com, you will see the following sentence: “That’s because in conversions, earnings and previously untaxed contributions in traditional IRAs are taxed—and that tax is figured based on all your traditional IRAs, EVEN ONES YOU AREN’T CONVERTING.”
So if a client has a $100,000 TIRA, a $15,000 TIRA, and the spouse has a $25,000 TIRA and the two smaller TIRAs are converted to two Roths (one of each spouse), the WSJ article leads me to believe that taxes would be owed as if they converted the entire $140,000 of IRAs.
Is this true and did the law change on this?
Also, if the $100,000 TIRA is rolled into the employee’s 401(k) plan on, say, September 30th, can they then, between 10/1/14 and 12/31/14, convert the two smaller TIRAs into Roth IRAs and only pay the taxes due on the $40,000 that was converted? To be more clear, does the timing of this matter?
Thank you.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Tue, 2014-09-23 19:33
Permalink Submitted by Jim Shope on Tue, 2014-09-23 19:51
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Tue, 2014-09-23 20:46
Permalink Submitted by Jim Shope on Wed, 2014-09-24 12:06