IRA owning a Fractional Life Settlement

Can an IRA invest in a fixed beneficial interest in the benefits payable in life insurance policies?

I am aware that an IRA cannot own a life insurance policy, a prohibited transaction.

Facts are:

The life settlement company acquires life insurance policies (the company which purchased the policy from the original owner), which has the right to collect the benefits payable under the policy when the insured dies. The life settlement company also has the right to sell the policy to another party. Fixed beneficial fractional interests in the policy are sold to Participants.

The life insurance policies have been acquired from previous life settlement transactions. The Participant acquires certain fixed beneficial interests in a trust which owns the life insurance policies. When the insured person dies and the affected insurer pays the policy benefit, the Participant receives the percentage of the death benefit in which such Participant holds a fixed beneficial interest.

Purchased life insurance policies are owned by a Settlement Trust, a Collateral Trust, for the benefit of Participants. The trustee of the trust is an LLC.

Can an IRA be a Participant without it being a prohibited transaction?

The fact the IRA does not own the policy, the Settlement Trust owns the policy, is the only way I see the possibility it is not a “Prohibited Transaction”.

The terminology above has been condensed from information contained in a Private Placement Memorandum for “The Sale of Beneficial Fractional Interests in the Benefits of Life Insurance Policies”.

Your opinions please!

I’m sure others have raised a similar question/issue.

Thanks,

Keith Youngren, CPA



  • From what I can tell, the IRS has not clearly ruled on these investments with respect to prohibited transactions. Probably the best source of any up to date developments on this would be the self directed IRA custodians who will allow these investments in their IRAs. They would probably know real quick if a client was having IRS issues. Has the term “viatical” disappeared due to a marketing stigma connected with that term?
  • Note that the IRS may not be aware that some of these investments are in IRA accounts, but they will be now that Form 5498 reporting requires specific coding of all alternative investment types, so the IRS will find out what is being held in self directed IRA accounts.
  • It could well be that the investment itself is more of a risk than a prohibited transaction. At the absolute least an IRA owner opting to purchase this investment in an IRA should first partition the IRA so that the account holding the investment does not hold any other investments to guard against the entire IRA being distributed.

 



This is an old post, so don’t know if anyone will see it, but….I have a client that owns 5 of these, in an IRA, and was told the distributions will be tax free because it’s life insurance.  I don’t see how this is possible it it is an IRA.  Was he sold a pile of lies, or am I missing something here?



IRA tax rules always prevail over how an investment would be taxed outside an IRA Therefore, a 1099R will be issued. Also, I have nothing more to add from the above post 3 years ago.



Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments