72t Distribution Details
Hi. I have a couple questions before feeling comfortable using the 72t rule to take early distribution from my IRA–without 10% penalty. I’ve read all the applicable tax code and various websites on the rule, but am left with some nagging details I was hoping you could help me with.
1. Assuming I take my first annual distribution on 15 Oct of this year, are there any annual proration rules I must follow (e.g., only take 3/12th of the annual payment) or can I take the full annual annuity amount as determined by the IRS calculation method? (FYI, I plan on taking annual payments vs. monthly or some other mode)
2. Should I take my annual distribution on the same exact day & month each year or does it matter so long as the exact annuity amount (dollar and cents) is taking each year (between 1 Jan and 31 Dec)?
3. When determining the account value to use in the annuity calculation (i’m using the amortization method), can I use the account value as of 15 Oct when I call and request the distribution from my IRA custodian and using a “print screen” shot of my online account balance to document/record to the IRS the balance I used in my annuity calculation? Or should I use the latest “official” account statement (a/o 30 Sep 15 in this case) from my custodian to use in my annuity calculation? If neither, what balance should I use that meets the IRS 72t rule to calculate my annuity payment?
4. How do I ‘inform’ the IRS that I’m using the 72t exemption rule? IAW, how do I communicate with the IRS/what form or documentation do I file with my tax return that shows them how I determined the distribution amount (i.e., the fed mid-term rate used, the present value used, and the annuity method used)? I realize I will report the IRA distribution as income on my 1040, but I’m not sure how the IRS will know that the amount declared meets the 72t exemption rule, particularly if my custodian doesn’t code the 1099B accurately.
5. On that point, how should I inform my IRA custodian of my 72t exemption to insure they code my 1099B correctly as an “early distribution with exemption” vs “an early distribution without exemption” and prevent them from withholding 10% penalty tax or raise a flag to the IRS?
I know this is a lot to ask, but I need to clarity on these tactical details to feel confident requesting using the 72t rule and requesting my first distribution from my IRA custodian.
Thank you so much for the help.
Mike C in Ohio
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Sat, 2015-09-19 23:12
Permalink Submitted by Michael Copley on Sun, 2015-09-20 14:28
I really appreciate the clarity on my earlier 72t detail questions–very helpful–thank you. Since those questions, i’ve been exploring immediate annuity calculators and with my current insurance company. I have a few more questions please.Can i use a life-time immediate income annuity product to meet the the IRS 72t rules? Reason I ask is because when i enter the same lump-sum amount into the single-life annuity calculator (with death benefit), the annual amount (paid monthly) is roughly $200 more per year than using the annuity or amortization IRS-prescribed calculation under 72t at a 2.18% interest rate. Since life-expectancy should be equal and 2.18% is the highest rate allowed by IRS code for the present month, it would suggest to me the higher insurance annuity amount would NOT meet the 72t distribution rules. Am i correct on this?I guess, alternatively, I could taper back the annuity premium to the point the monthly payment doesn’t exceed a 2.18%-generated payment. Since this is a maximum rate, i would assume an annunal amount that is slightly LOWER would make the insurance annuity viable. And, my insurance company informs me they are familar with the 72t rule and will code the 1099 correctly. Does this make sense?I appreciate your help on these matters; more specifically, how one specifially can use an insurance annuity (single-life immediate payout) that complies with the 72t code/rules.
Permalink Submitted by Michael Copley on Sun, 2015-09-20 20:11
Alan, you advised that I could go as far back to my Jul Statement for an Oct 15th initial annual distribution, so long as the difference in account value from 31 Jul doesn’t exceed 10% (and no contributions or distributions between the time period were made) from the 15 Oct value (or value when i drop off the request to my local office presumaby). That actually does work in my favor. Could you point me to the IRS code or revenue ruling that explains this 10% threshold for determining account balance you mention please and the rule that tells me going back three months to establish my account balance is allowed? Seems like the only rule on determining account balance is that the value must be reasonably determined. So i’m trying to understand how going back to Jul is as reasonable as going back to the latest statement available (31 Aug in this case). If IRS were to audit me and ask why I used Jul statement vs Aug or Sep statement, i need to have a good answer for that…citing the rule that allows me to choose the higher historical value. Right now, as you correctly suggested, my Jul EOM account value is higher by 8% than the current balance today (I have numerous equities in the account). I could actually take my first distribution start next week (instead of 15 Oct) by dropping off the distribution form with my local brokerage office. If i do, i will screen shot the value as of tomorrow for my records so that I can show it’s value is less than 10% lower than my 31 Jul statement value.Thanks very much for the clarification on this finer detail.Mike from Ohio
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Sun, 2015-09-20 22:59
Permalink Submitted by Michael Copley on Mon, 2015-09-21 14:55
Alan, didn’t meen to confuse you. I’ve been doing ‘what-if’ calculations over the weekend. Right now, my IRA is with Schwab in a brokerage account. Schwab and my Insurance company, USAA, both have annuity calculators. I will either do a 72t plan from the brokerage account or transfer the money first to an new IRA annuity account…then annuitize. As my earlier note explained, when i use the annuity calculator, it yields a higher amount of annual income over my life time than what the 72t calculator yields at 2.18%. Both calculations assume life expectency. Insurance annuities include mortality credits though, which is why i believe it yields a higher income stream than the 72t plan. That’s why i’m thinking about transfering to an annuity account.What I’m trying to figure out is does the IRS consider a single-life immediate annuity that is annuitized as meeting the 72t substantially equal periodic payment criteria even though the annual amount is a couple hundred dollars more than the 2.18% max rate (current) allowed using the IRS annuity or amortization method. You have any additional thoughts on this before I punt?
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Mon, 2015-09-21 17:55
OK – the IRS only authorizes 3 calculation methods for 72t plans. There is no penalty exception for life annuities for IRA accounts, although there is for non qualified annuities. Any calculator that does not state that it is constructed for 72t plans will not produce an annual distribution amount that complies with the requirements. An insurance company should not be using code 2 on the 1099R in this situation, but they might be confused because almost all of their annuitized contracts are non qualified annuities or pension plans that get code 2 due to separation at age 55 or later. Some people use an IRA annuity in their 72t plan, but they are not annuitized and the annual distribution is determined by one of the 2 fixed dollar methods, or rarely using the RMD method.