RMD
Is my client required to take an RMD if the traditional IRA account had a zero balance on 12/31/14 and 12/31/15? We recharacterized a Roth to a traditional then converted it back to a Roth within 30 days in 2015. Their tax advisor said their tax software is looking for an RMD. The client was 72 on 1/1/15. Thanks so much!
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Fri, 2016-02-19 16:59
I assume this was a Roth conversion done at some point. Would need the date of the conversion and the date of the recharacterization as well as the client’s full DOB. Also the date of any separate RMDs the client actually took since RMDs began. There may also be issues regarding doing the second conversion in an RMD year before the RMD was completed.
Permalink Submitted by Candy Irwin on Fri, 2016-02-19 17:39
Alan, Roth contribution made 05/22/2014 and again on 04/01/2015. both contributions were recharacterized plus earnings on 04/10/2015. Then converted back to the Roth on 05/07/2015. Income as too hign on 2014 tax retrun for Roth contribution. No RMD was ever taken. There was not a traditional IRA for the client when the Roth contributions began. DOB is 03/19/1942Thanks for you help!Candy
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Fri, 2016-02-19 21:12
Permalink Submitted by Candy Irwin on Fri, 2016-02-19 21:25
Alan,Thanks for your inforamtion. I did forget to mention that the client has no earnings but his spouse is much younger with earnings so it was originally done as a spousal IRA. I dont know if that would have any bearing on the situation or not.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Fri, 2016-02-19 21:50
Client could make a spousal Roth contribution using spouse’s earnings but only if their joint modified AGI was not too high. The MAGI must have been too high otherwise that contribution would not have been recharacterized as a TIRA contribution. Client could not make a spousal TIRA contribution because of his age even using the income of the younger spouse. However, if HE had been the younger spouse he could have made a spousal contribution using the income of the older spouse. In other words, for spousal contributions the age requirements are based on the age of the spouse receiving the contribution, not the spouse with the income. Therefore, all this still leaves him with those excess contributions.