Inherited 401k – Stretch

I recently read Michael Kitces article “Planning Opportunities for Non-Spouse Beneficiaries of Inherited Retirement Accounts”

Mr Kitces discusses the options available to a non spouse upon inheriting a 401(k) – most of which I am familiar.

The following is where he lost me

“In other words, an employer retirement plan that doesn’t offer non-spouse beneficiaries the option to Stretch an inherited employer retirement account must provide the opportunity to a do a trustee-to-trustee transfer to an inherited IRA instead (where it can be stretched)”

Question

For a plan that does offer a non-spouse bene the “stretch” option – is it required for the plan to also offer the opportunity to do a “trustee-to-trustee transfer to an inherited IRA? In other words in a plan that offers a “stretch” can the non spouse elect to trustee transfer the assets to an inherited instead – “stretching” from the IRA instead of the plan? Or is the bene required to stretch from the plan?

Thank you



  • Yes, the qualified plan must offer a designated non spouse beneficiary or qualified trust a direct rollover to an inherited IRA. Since 2009. a beneficiary has the same rights to a direct rollover as the decedent would have had under Sec 401(a)(31).  This was introduced in Sec 829 of the PPA in 2006 as an option, but was made mandatory with WRERA in Dec, 2008 effective 1/1/2009.
  • The financial press including the referenced article will emphasize cases where the plan is restrictive such as requiring the 5 year rule for deaths prior to the RBD, because the direct rollover is the only way to preserve a stretch. But the direct rollover is also mandatory for whatever reason the beneficiary has for preferring an inherited IRA account. For example, the investment options and expenses might be lower.
  • I would assume that the article also mentioned the option of a direct rollover to an inherited Roth IRA.


Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments