Total balance of Rolled over IRA account on 1099 R for distribution?
If a spouse inherits a traditional IRA from her husband and sets up a new IRA account putting the IRA proceeds from the deceased’s IRA into an IRA (with only her name in the title) with the same Custodian— which I believe is called a Rollover– and it correctly shows a code of 4 in box 7, and also says, “Total Distribution” “Taxable amount not determined,” is it correct that the 1099R for this new IRA shows the total account balance ?
If so, how would the IRS know that this wasn’t a lump sum cash payment instead of a tax free Rollover and expect tax on that total amount instead of on an RMD distribution? They did issue a 5498 which says, “Rollover Contributions” for the total account balance. Would this clarify so IRS would not think the entire “distribution” should be taxed as a lump sum when in fact it was a spousal Rollover? When others have inherited IRAs as Non spouse Beneficiaries, only the final RMD from the original IRA was listed as “Total Distribution” (as in closing the account) not the entire account balance, but maybe spousal IRAs are different in this way too?
If this is alright, should the total distribution from all her IRAs including the Rollover would be entered on Line 15a , with “Rollover” entered next to line 15b, and then the amount from her other IRA which wasn’t a Rollover (and thus taxable) to the right of “rollover?” Thanks for any help you can offer.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Sun, 2018-05-13 20:22
Permalink Submitted by Cheryl Van Beek on Sun, 2018-05-13 20:51
Thank you I had a feeling it was done wrong. Also, I’m sorry but would you please clarifywhat you mean by ” A code 4 distribution means that the amount of the beneficiary RMD cannot be rolled over? “
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Sun, 2018-05-13 21:12
If the surviving spouse would have been required to take a beneficiary RMD, a distribution includes that RMD. An RMD can never be rolled over once distributed. The code 4 indicates a distribution made to a beneficiary, not to an owner. Electing to assume ownership would have eliminated a distribution, but even if a distribution was reported it would be a code 7 (normal) and the RMD would have been the lower owner’s RMD (if surviving spouse was 70.5 or more).
Permalink Submitted by Cheryl Van Beek on Mon, 2018-05-14 00:30
No 8606 is being done, so to confirm, on line 15a she’d report total amount shown on 1099Rs and then on 15b she’d report the taxable amount of her own distribution? Also, since 5498 says “Rollover Contributions” for the total account balance, will the IRS likely know that the rollover was nontaxable–that this wasn’t a lump sum cash payment instead of a tax free Rollover and not expect tax on that total amount instead of on an RMD distribution? Thank you so much for your time, detail and help.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Mon, 2018-05-14 02:23
Permalink Submitted by Ben Meyer on Mon, 2018-05-14 15:54