Mechanics of Conduit Trust as Beneficiary.
I am somewhat confused with the actual “mechanics” of how a stretched inherited IRA works with a conduit trust as the beneficiary. This is what I understand but I may very well be wrong. Please enlighten me.
1. Parent established a trust named “Parent IRA Conduit Trust” that becomes irrevocable at the death of Parent. This trust states that at his death the Parent IRA Conduit Trust will be divided into the following sub-trust. 50% to Child A IRA Conduit Trust and 50% to Child B IRA Conduit Trust .
2. The Parent informs Fidelity Investments that the beneficiaries of the IRA is ???? Parent IRA Conduit Trust or should the Beneficiaries be the sub-trust that is 50% to Child A IRA Conduit Trust and 50% to Child B IRA Conduit Trust ? Who is the correct beneficiaries, the original Parent IRA Conduit Trust or the two sub-trust? I do not understand the following statement :§ 06: The one thing that should never be done is to move all the IRA assets to the trust. ” Is this prevented by correctly titling the inherited IRA
3. I understand that correctly titled inherited IRAs must be set up for the trust beneficiary such as “Parent, deceased, IRA fbo Child A IRA Conduit Trust” and “Parent, deceased, IRA fbo Child B IRA Conduit Trust” each with a Tax ID number. I assume that the Trustee not Child A or B are the person that controls these IRA accounts. Am I correct? I assume it is OK to move the IRA assets into these accounts, but is not these accounts the trust accounts?????
4. The RMD are transferred from the Parent, deceased, IRA fbo Child A IRA Conduit Trust account to the Child A’s bank account.
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Wed, 2019-01-30 03:05
Permalink Submitted by Norman Cook on Wed, 2019-01-30 15:29
I am still not clear on Who is the correct beneficiaries that should be listed with Fidelity — the original Parent IRA Conduit Trust or the two sub-trust?
Permalink Submitted by Bruce Steiner on Thu, 2019-01-31 03:19
Conduit trusts rarely make sense. Over time they force out all of the IRA benefits, throwing them into the beneficiaries’ estates and subjecting them to the beneficiaries’ creditors and spouses, thus defeating the purpose of the trust. It’s usually better to make the trusts fully discretionary.
Permalink Submitted by Norman Cook on Thu, 2019-01-31 03:45
1. With the higher exclusion ($11.4M) on estates, few will have an estate tax problem. 2. Does the higher tax rate (37%) on the Trust vs 22% or 24% individiual rate offset the creditor/spouses risk?
Permalink Submitted by William Tuttle on Thu, 2019-01-31 16:39
Permalink Submitted by Patricia Monat on Tue, 2019-03-19 19:10
Client’s sister named her revocable trust as beneficary of her IRA. Her sole remaining benefiary in the trust is her sister. Can we distribute out the IRA to her sister as the sole benefiary of the trust and keep it as an inherited IRA with all the tax benefits? Or do we keep it as an inherited IRA with the trust as beneficiary and only distribute out the RMD each year to that beneficiary. Thoughts?
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Tue, 2019-03-19 19:47
The trust provisions dictate whether it is possible to dissolve the trust or the trustee might have discretion to do that. If so, the inherited IRA can be assigned to the remaining trust beneficiary, although this can be a hassle with some IRA custodians. If the trust was qualified for look through treatment then the inherited IRA RMD distribution period will be based on the single life expectancy of that beneficiary.
Permalink Submitted by Bruce Steiner on Wed, 2019-03-20 01:59