RMDs

A client passed away on 7/22/19. She was born 9/9/1940 and was 78 years old at the time of her death. The beneficiaries of the IRA are two charities, plus three individual personal beneficiaries. One individual beneficiary was born 3/9/1941, another individual was born 10/14/54, and the last individual beneficiary was born 10/14/54. The charitable beneficiaries will be paid out soon in this year, so that each individual beneficiary can then create their own inherited IRA and use their own stretch. We will then use the Single Life Table, using their ages at the end of 2020.
When an IRA owner dies who is older than 70 1/2 , one option I believe available is to us the life expectancy of the deceased. Is that the Single Life Table or another table? Which table is it? I ask because the oldest individual, at age 79 next year, would have a factor of 10.8 and reducing that by 1 each year, would have only a ten year stretch. I was wondering if the life expectancy table of the deceased could stretch it out longer or if there is another solution with a longer strectch.



  • Using the decedent’s life expectancy, beneficiary RMDs would be determined based on the decedent’s single life expectancy in the year of death, reduced by 1 for each subsequent year.  The decedent would have been age 79 on 9/9/2019, so the divisor for 2020 would be 10.8 – 1 =  9.8.  As you indicated, the divisor based on the oldest beneficiary’s single life expectancy in 2020 is 10.8 for 2020.  Since 10.8 is greater than 9.8, the RMDs for the oldest beneficiary are based on the life expectancy of this beneficiary, not the life expectancy of the decedent.
  • Depending on the amount to be distributed to the charities, it’s possible the decedent’s year-of-death RMD will be satisfied by the payout the to the charities if the decedent had not already satisfied the 2019 RMD.  If so, none of the other beneficiaries would need to take any distributions in 2019.

When the remaining life expectancy of the decedent using the single life table is used the calculation first uses the age in the year of death, then reduces that divisor by 1.0 for each year thereafter. Decedent would have been 79 this year with a divisor of 10.8. The 2020 beneficiary RMD using the decedent’s age would therefore use a divisor of 9.8 which produces a larger RMD than the 10.8 that would apply using the age of the beneficiary in the first RMD year. Therefore, the decedent’s age would not be applied in this situation. The difference is the one year difference in determining what divisors apply using decedent vs. the beneficiary.

Add new comment

Log in or register to post comments