RMD Question
Jon, one additional fact – my sister passed four months after my Mom passed – Mom died in March and sister in July – Mom had already taken her RMD in the year she passed (we withdrew the monies in January) – so my sister never took a distribution – the first time we would have done that was the following January – Morgan Stanley (albeit not tax advisors) suggested that since there was no distribution it believed that the kids could be deemed the beneficiary and not the successor – let me know – no rush – John
Mother with IRA passed away in March 2019. Mother is over 70 1/2 and took RMD in 2019. Beneficiary is the daughter. Daughter passes away is July 2019. Daughter never took distribution. Now the accounts are going to the Daughters children.
Question: are the children deemed beneficiaries in the eyes of the IRS (because there was no distribution from the daughter? Or are the children deemed successor beneficiaries in the eyes of the IRS. I’m looking at Inherited IRA rules and if the kids would be considered successor beneficiaries inheriting the inherited IRA or if the kids could be treated as beneficiaries because no RMD was taken from the daughter in 2019. Help?
Permalink Submitted by Alan - IRA critic on Mon, 2019-12-02 18:31