IRS “Hypothetical RMD Rule” Prevents Surviving Spouses from Avoiding RMDs

Monday, July 15, 2024

By Ian Berger, JD
IRA Analyst

One of the more interesting rules (if any could be called “interesting”) from the 2022 IRS proposed regulations requires spouse beneficiaries in some situations to take RMDs (required minimum distributions) before doing a spousal rollover. The IRS calls these RMDs “catch-up” or “hypothetical” RMDs. At first, it was hard to figure out where the IRS was going with this special rule. But after some analysis, it is clear the IRS was trying to close a loophole that spouse beneficiaries could use in very limited situations to avoid RMDs.

Here’s some background. When a surviving spouse inherits an IRA, that spouse can remain a beneficiary or do a spousal rollover (a rollover to her own IRA). There’s another IRS rule that applies when a surviving spouse who remains a beneficiary inherits from an IRA owner who dies before his RMD “required beginning date” (April 1 of the year following the age 73 year). In that case, the spouse beneficiary can elect to stretch RMDs over her single life expectancy or use the 10-year payout rule with no annual RMDs. (This election is available to other “eligible designated beneficiaries” as well.)

So, let’s assume we have surviving spouse Ava who inherits an IRA at age 70 in 2023 from her deceased husband Manuel who died at age 72. Ava decides to remain a beneficiary and elects the 10-year rule. Since Manuel died before his RMD required beginning date, the 10-year rule would normally allow Ava to defer any RMDs until 12/31/33 – the end of the 10-year period.

Ava thinks she can game the system. She could use the 10-year rule (with no annual RMDs) for 8 or 9 years and then do a spousal rollover. That way, she could avoid annual RMDs that she otherwise would have been required to take from her own IRA starting at age 73.

Unfortunately for Ava, some smart IRS employee already thought of this and came up with the hypothetical RMD rule to stymie this scheme. Ava can still do a spousal rollover. But she must first calculate the RMDs she would have taken for each year she was age 73 or older. Like any RMDs, these hypothetical RMDs are not eligible for rollover. So, she must first take those RMDs before she could roll over the remaining part of the inherited IRA in a spousal rollover to her own IRA.

Add this to the list of “too-good-to-be-true” tax avoidance ideas foiled by the IRS.

Post Views: 2,668

Content Citation Guidelines

Below is the required verbiage that must be added to any re-branded piece from Ed Slott and Company, LLC or IRA Help, LLC. The verbiage must be used any time you take text from a piece and put it onto your own letterhead, within your newsletter, on your website, etc. Verbiage varies based on where you’re taking the content from.

Please be advised that prior to distributing re-branded content, you must send a proof to [email protected] for approval.

For white papers/other outflow pieces:

Copyright © [year of publication], [Ed Slott and Company, LLC or IRA Help, LLC – depending on what it says on the original piece] Reprinted with permission [Ed Slott and Company, LLC or IRA Help, LLC – depending on what it says on the original piece] takes no responsibility for the current accuracy of this information.

For charts:

Copyright © [year of publication], Ed Slott and Company, LLC Reprinted with permission Ed Slott and Company, LLC takes no responsibility for the current accuracy of this information.

For Slott Report articles:

Copyright © [year of article], Ed Slott and Company, LLC Reprinted from The Slott Report, [insert date of article], with permission. [Insert article URL] Ed Slott and Company, LLC takes no responsibility for the current accuracy of this article.

Please contact Matt Smith at [email protected] or (516) 536-8282 with any questions.